GOP keeps asking for more evidence, but won't allow ....

(( Perhaps you could point me to the first time you posted the impeachable offenses, mr jigsaw-II? ))

Tell me something omiaqt, after telling me that "I'm talking in circles", why would I want to do anything for you. I could tell you go find it yourself, but, being the nice guy that I am, I won't do that.

I am not going to dig through my archives looking for the "First Time". So, seeing as I'm not under oath, I am not going to use my own words, but instead, I'm going to use the words of a man who is under oath, Mr. Sondland.

Not only will you be able to read his words, You'll also be able to hear his voice under oath. I don't know about you, omiaqt, but I tend to trust statements made under oath, until there is evidence that statements were untruthful.

OK, here you go, omiaqt. You can do whatever you want with this:>>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Sondland: (29:07) << If you want to hear Mr. Sondland's speak, click on the time stamp then click the play button...

I know that members of this committee frequently frame these complicated issues in the form of a simple question. Was there a quid pro quo? As I testified previously with regard to the requested White House call and the White House meeting, the answer is yes. Mr. Giuliani conveyed to Secretary Perry, Ambassador Volker and others that President Trump wanted a public statement from President Zelensky committing to investigations of Burisma and the 2016 election. Mr. Giuliani expressed those requests directly to the Ukrainians and Mr. Giuliani also expressed those requests directly to us. We all understood that these prerequisites for the White House call and the White House meeting reflected President Trump’s desires and requirements.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now, omiaqt, if you go the U. S. Constitution and read about Articles of Impeachment Article 1, Section 2, you will find that Quid-Pro-Quo (aka Bribery/extortion) IS an Impeachable offense...