The impeachment mini series written by pelosi directed by schiff

[dont-blameme]

staring members of the kangaroo house democrats. Kangaroos house democrats will move to convict trump on hearsay information and he said she said this or as one kangaroo house democrat put it hearsay is more valuable that actual proof.

[wvit1001]

maybe Bolton or Mulvaney or trump himself will show up to clear things up for everyone. 

[dont-blameme]

When it get to the senate the whistle blower will show up and sink the democrats that is if he's not in jail on federal charges.

[chuck_curtis]

Episode one was a flop.

[dont-blameme]

wvit who's responsible for foreign policy?

[Truman62]

LOL And denial is all the GOPpers have.
No witnesses.
No sources.
No proof.
Nothing.  Nada.  Zilch.  Zippo.

Democrats have ALL that in spades.
Democrats have MORE witnesses.
Democrats have MORE sources.
Democrats have MORE proof.

[dont-blameme]

Once again davik62 demonstrates why he was awarded the title of stupid62.

[wvit1001]

How about the revelation of the hypocrisy phone call between Sondland and trump that everyone at the restaurant table was able to hear?    Sondland will be testifying next week you know.

[wvit1001]

According to Taylor, his aide heard Trump ask about "the investigations" - and Sondland replied that Ukraine was ready to move forward.Sondland then told Taylor's aide that the president cared more about the investigation of the Bidens than anything else involving Ukraine.

[Truman62]

LMAO And ONCE AGAIN all Balmie has is an insult refute the evidence.

No proof.  No witness.  No evidence.  Just denial and insults!

Don't worry, normal Americans will realize that you GOPpers have nothing,
and that tRump broke the law time and time again.

[Truman62]

BTW - Who wrote this miniseries Balmie?  Let's give them credit?
Who directed it?
Who choreographed it?
Who produced it?
Who edited it?
If it was so carefully planned, as you claim, then there had to be LOTS of people involved.
Well then... who were they?  Can you even name one and provide proof?

Do you have a pdf of the original screenplay?

[JigSaw-II]

I watched the first impeachment hearing from gavel to gavel.  My take away: not one republican could/would defend trump.  All they did was repeat what the witnesses said then ask then if that is what they said.  Jim Jordan, on the other hand, was the top ass-clown of the day.  All Jim could do is rant about not being able to out the whistleblower and bitch about secondhand information.

Jim need to learn the basic of Congressional protection of whistle-blowers and the value of second hand information. If trump is so clean and there was no Quid-Pro-Quo, why won't trump let Executive Brand witness testify at the hearings. They could tell the world just how innocent trump is, right??