Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
06 17, 19, 11:16:36:AM

Login with username and password

Where can UnBorn Babies go to apply for Asylum from Killer mothers?

Search:     Advanced search
2168492 Posts in 245562 Topics by 302 Members
Latest Member: test
* Website Home Help Login Register
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: Trump’s idea to send immigrants to sanctuary cities makes no sense 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1  Print
Author Topic: Trump’s idea to send immigrants to sanctuary cities makes no sense  (Read 10 times)
Sr. Member

Posts: I am a geek!!

« on: 04 15, 19, 08:18:14:PM » Reply

trump confuses political stuff with actual policy.

Trump’s rhetoric about undocumented immigrants and asylum seekers has not just been about how they are taking advantage of lax American laws or that they are in the country illegally but that they are also dangerous. He has decried them as gang members, “animals” and even terrorists. He has said Mexico and Central American countries are sending their dregs northward. “They’re bringing drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists,” Trump said in his 2015 presidential announcement speech, “and some, I assume, are good people.”

The first major issue with this is that, regardless of where these people are sent, they can go wherever they want after that. The Post’s Nick Miroff and Tim Meko this weekend showed us where people tend to go once they cross the border, and it’s to nearly every corner of the country. If people have the means and wherewithal to get from the border to Crookston, Minn., what’s to stop them from, after they get sent to San Francisco, simply resuming their plans to go wherever they initially intended to go?

Supporters of this policy would argue that they might just stay in the sanctuary city because it is welcoming, but there are reasons people make long treks to places like Crookston rather than heading straight for sanctuary cities. They may have family in the area. They may know there is work waiting for them. And being diverted initially upon entry isn’t likely to deter many of them from reaching wherever it is they hope their final destination will be.

The second issue is that this does nothing to address the allegedly huge problems Trump brought up. There is no evidence that these immigrants or asylum seekers are responsible for more crime than American citizens, and Trump’s own administration has said there is no evidence of terrorist groups accessing the United States via the Southern border.

And finally, there is the incentive that this would create. Trump has rather clearly embraced things like family separation as a deterrent — in hopes that it would send a message to other would-be border-crossers that they would rather not deal with all that crossing the border entails. This policy would create the opposite incentive. It would tell people who cross the border illegally or seek asylum that they would get a one-way ticket to what are mostly major American cities. That seems a much more attractive prospect than simply being detained.

Sr. Member

Posts: 61634

« Reply #1 on: 04 15, 19, 08:25:34:PM » Reply

Why not send them to califorcation and new York city. sanfranqueerco, should get the majority.
Pages: 1  Print 
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: Trump’s idea to send immigrants to sanctuary cities makes no sense
Jump to:  

AesopsRetreat Links

YouTube Channel

Build The Wall
Go FundMe Link

Rules For Radicals.

2nd Amendment Source

5 minute Education

Join Me at KIVA
My Kiva Stats

Truth About
Slaves and Indians

r/K Theory

White Privilege

What Do We Believe

Part 1:
Small Govt & Free Enterprise

Part 2:

The Problem with Elitism

Part 3:
Wealth Creation

Part 4:
Natural Law

Global Warming Scam

Lend a hand

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © AesopsRetreat
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 27 queries.