Alabama judge allows teen to sue on behalf of aborted fetus

[chuck_curtis]

Evidently so.  The murderers are still free, and there is no justice.

[Boddhissatva]

Chuck,

do you support abortion in any situation? 

[chuck_curtis]

Possibly, but the corner cases are relatively rare.

[Boddhissatva]

chuck, thanks for asking.

Unfortunately, this is a topic that rarely results in an honest, rational conversation because both sides are incredibly, emotionally invested in it. 

[omiaqt]

Abortions kill 100% of the time and are the leading cause of human death.

[sine-qua-non]

The constitution of the US does not support abortion rights

That was made up by the SCOTUS which does not make law ala RvW

It’s a States rights issue then  as Alabama and 35 other states have it as murder

Scott Pederson was found guilty of double homicide for the murder of his pregnant wife and son.

Now, liberals are legalizing murder of babies in NY and VA

Not surprising since their FAKE potus Barry Soetoro even voted for killing a viable baby that survived the abortion Dr’s

[Boddhissatva]

Omia, and Sine

let me ask you the same question.

would you find abortion acceptable in some situations, or do you always find it wrong, 100 percent of the time?

[D2D]

What situations would that be?

Some say in the case of rape/incest abortion would be justified despite the fact the baby never committed any crime!

I say the baby has the right to life!

Some say in the case of retardation or other defect abortion would be justified!

I say in the age of CRISPR such problems will soon be correctable!

Some say in the case of emotional distress of the mother abortion would be justified despite the fact the innocent baby had nothing to do with it!

I say emotional distress is temporary but guilt over murdering your child is permanent!

Some say in the case of risk to the life of the mother abortion would be justified!

I say who can live with the thought their life was bought at the expense of an innocent child's life?

I couldn't!

The fact is abortion is a tool of the selfish who cannot bear the idea of some inconvenience for just 9 months!

[1965hawks]

To: chuck_Curtis, d2dvd!, jim, omiaqt, local5th, dont-blameme, and sine-qua-non

Re: Ryan Magers's suit

To: chuck_curtis, d2dvd!, jim, omiaqt, local5th, dont-blameme, and sine-qua-non

Define standing and then explain how Judge Barger allowed Mager and an aborted fetus to sue the abortion clinic.

[D2D]

Read the judge's ruling!

He fully explains it!

I accept the fact this ruling will go all the way to the Supreme Court!

Should the court rule he does have standing, that would affirm father's rights and necessitate getting the father's approval for an abortion to take place!

This could be the opening to a brave new life valuing world!

[1965hawks]

d2dvd!,

I just reread the article, after reading it several times before I posted my reply, and I didn't see any ruling from Judge Barger. The only thing the article says about Judge Barger is that he allowed Mr Magers and an aborted foetus to sue an abortion clinic. But that's beside the point. I asked for you (and several other discussants in this thread) to define standing and then explain how the judge arrived at the conclusion that Magers and an aborted foetus had standing to sue. Abortion-rights activist are correct to call this suit frivolous and idiotic, and one would hope that this case would be used to strike down Alabama's so-called infanticide law.

[chuck_curtis]

I just reread the article, after reading it several times before I posted my reply, and I didn't see any ruling from Judge Barger.

So, you didn't read the ruling?