Trump Could Be Charged W/ 3 Crimes And Indicted While President

[wvit1001]

Fox News Top Legal Analyst Says Donald Trump Could Be Charged With Three Crimes And Indicted While President



“My view is that he can be indicted but cannot be prosecuted until leaving office because the disruption to the government of the prosecution would be far more than the Constitution tolerates,” Napolitano said.

Rudy Giuliani, Trump's personal lawyer, has already said that if Trump were subpoenaed by special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, they would take the matter all the way to the Supreme Court. Napolitano, a former judge, added that a Trump indictment could lead to another lengthy legal battle.

“I think they'll fight both all the way to the Supreme Court,” he said on Trump’s favorite cable news network. “They’ll lose on the subpoena because the Supreme Court has already ruled on that. I don't know where they'll go on the indictment, if an indictment comes.”



https://www.newsweek.com/fox-news-donald-trump-indicted-crimes-1252538

[wvit1001]

Indeed, said Napolitano, Trump could face even more legal peril than Cohen over the campaign finance violations, which center on payments made to two women to ensure their silence about alleged affairs with Trump, before the 2016 election.

“He is on their radar screen for paying someone to commit a crime, which in itself is three crimes,” Napolitano said. “It’s the crime, it’s conspiracy to commit the crime and it’s procuring someone to commit a crime. So he’s actually, if all this is correct and they have the evidence for it, exposed to more criminal activity than Michael Cohen.”

[justincase]

repubs = filthy, stinking garbage.

[Dan]

1.  Trump didn't violate any crime
2.  Trump couldn't be indicted even if he did.

[Dan]

Libs are filthy stinking liars.

[Local5th]

In your dreams.

[Dan]

Paying extortion is not a crime.

[wvit1001]

not normally, but when you're running a federal campaign having officials from your campaign making payments like this without reporting them can be a crime.

[Local5th]

but when you're running a federal campaign having officials from your campaign making payments like this without reporting them can be a crime.


Clinton didn't report paying for the Russian dossier either. It was hidden under legal fees.

At most she will pay a fine. Trump will too if it's shown it was an election expense.

[Dan]

when you're running a federal campaign having officials from your campaign making payments like this without reporting them can be a crime.

[/FONT]


But it had nothing to do with the campaign.  No campaign funds were used.  If campaign funds were used, would you not then claim it was a PERSONAL expense?  Admit it.  You would.  The NDAs were personal expenses, not campaign expenses.  That's why he used personal money.   This is just another attack attempted by the TDS libs to get rid of Trump.  I admire your tenacity and relentlessness.

[warrenpees]

https://www.snopes.com/news/2017/10/25/dnc-clinton-campaign-pay-trump-russia-steele-dossier/

[wmdn_bs]

If/when evidence of Trump's crimes are reported, he can and should be indicted. The indictment would prevent the statute of limitations from protecting him while he serves out his term(s), allowing him to carry out his duties as long as he is in office.. Then he could begin his prison terms. Regardless of what you rightwing armchair wannabe constitutional lawyers think, smarter, better educated folks than you, have already determined that and are ready to argue it all the way to SCOTUS. I think they will/would win. Don't you?