Our framers wasn't stupid and our constitution shows their brilliance:

[wvit1001]

Let’s take another listen to Justice Scalia in Heller, shall we? The Second Amendment, he stated, does not protect “the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation, just as we do not read the First Amendment to protect the right of citizens to speak for any purpose.” He further noted that nothing in the court’s decision “should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

[D2D]

Yet you insist Scalia says bans were justifiable and desired!

Where did he say that!

[wvit1001]

what bans are you referring to d2?

[D2D]

The bans Democrats are calling for!

[wvit1001]

what bans d2?   anything more specific or is this just another instance of your bullshit?

[D2D]

Look at the bans California just instituted!

Thanks to Democrats abusers and stalkers have 10 days to kill their victims!

[sine-qua-non]

See reply #23

Dims threatened gun grabs

They are confiscating guns from those they deem incompetent or who have a mere misdemeanor in socialist sancturary lawless California

Soon to go full third worldly

They protect illegals who murder its citizens

[wvit1001]

the california law passed in 2017 sounds like a good piece of legislation d2.   it didn't ban guns, it only made new assault weapons illegal.   existing weapons weren't outlawed.

[D2D]

That is a ban moron!

[justincase]

At the Jefferson Memorial in D.C. Thomas Jefferson knew that times would change and laws would have to be updated.

[wvit1001]

Let’s take another listen to Justice Scalia in Heller, shall we? The Second Amendment, he stated, does not protect “the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation, just as we do not read the First Amendment to protect the right of citizens to speak for any purpose.” He further noted that nothing in the court’s decision “should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

[sine-qua-non]

or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms


Scalia doesn’t make law nitwit

His opinions are his own not ours or what the 2nd says it still says and means as written