Our framers wasn't stupid and our constitution shows their brilliance:

[wvit1001]

who here said they did blammey?   so far you're the only one I've seen saying anything like that.

[1965hawks]

To: d2d! and dont-blameme

The Second Amendment reads in its entirety as follows:

"A well regulated militia, being neccesary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Point out exactly in the Second Amendment where it constitutionally protects the private ownership and use of firearms and where it provides a constitutional barrier against gun-control laws.

[dont-blameme]

ms-wvit must you always act so damn stupid or is it an act?

This was in your post,   We can ban firearms such as military-style assault weapons. But you left wing radical democrats idiot are not saying it are you!

[justincase]

At the Jefferson Memorial in D.C. Thomas Jefferson knew that times would change and laws would have to be updated.

[D2D]

 

To: d2d! and dont-blameme

The Second Amendment reads in its entirety as follows:

"A well regulated militia, being neccesary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Point out exactly in the Second Amendment where it constitutionally protects the private ownership and use of firearms and where it provides a constitutional barrier against gun-control laws.

"A well regulated militia, being neccesary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

[justincase]

At the Jefferson Memorial in D.C. Thomas Jefferson knew that times would change and laws would have to be updated.

[omiaqt]

I am glad the United States Supreme Court determined the meaning of the 2nd Amendment and not hawk1965!

[wvit1001]

Let’s take another listen to Justice Scalia in Heller, shall we? The Second Amendment, he stated, does not protect “the right of citizens to carry arms for any sort of confrontation, just as we do not read the First Amendment to protect the right of citizens to speak for any purpose.” He further noted that nothing in the court’s decision “should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms.”

Protecting the right to keep and bear arms is not the same as forbidding all regulations on that right. We can protect that right and still require background checks, permits, and training. We can still regulate when, where, and what kinds of guns are allowed. In some cases, we can regulate who can obtain guns, imposing restrictions on, for instance, felons, the mentally ill, and known terrorists. We can ban firearms such as military-style assault weapons that (like child pornography) plainly cause far more harm than they add in value. We can require those who are negligent with their weapons (as we do those who are negligent with their words in defamation cases) to be held liable for the harm they inflict on others. We can do all of these things; we just don’t.

[sine-qua-non]

The right is unlimited to all able bodied men

Those terms cover guess what,? ...... that’s right, all able, bodied, men !

ThT means sound of body and mind, and of age!  They covered it didn’t they!

Women were more valuable as reloaders and more protected but were not forgotten !

So you see, the founders never though that any court would have to rule on Any weapon or type

Or that 9 unelected position for life judges should have final say on millions of Americans rights AS written .

[D2D]

Where did Scalia say firearms would be banned?

[omiaqt]

I am quite sure Democrats are chomping at the bit, to be the first offering the repeal of the 2nd Amendment?

[sine-qua-non]

I heard Democrat U S Senator from The people’s Gulag of Kalifornia say she wanted us to turn them all in Mr. &  Mrs America