DC Federal Court Ruled Carrying Guns In Public A 2nd amendment Right

[1965hawks]

local5th,

As I've noted earlier in this thread, you really don't know what the fuck you're babbling about when you post your opinionated drivel on this message board.


1. What the states ratified in 1790, strictly speaking, was not really a bill of rights. Instead of guaranteeing the civil rights of an individual,in actuality, the original amendments emphasised popular sovereignty, defined federalism, and even protected state rights.

2. The purpose and intent of inserting the Second Amendment into Constitution was to prevent the federal government from passing laws that would disarm the Militia-- a great concern of the people and the states before ratification of the Second Amendment. Throughout Us history, maintaining (keeping) militias is and always has been a state right, not a right of citizenship. The Second Amendment is really protects a state right, not a "right of the people" (a civil right), as you're trying to argue here.

3. As used in the Second Amendment, the people has a dual meaning--the people drawn from the general population to render military service (bear arms) in the Militia and the people--a political term--meaning the state itself.



A government-controlled militia is necessary to the security of a free state; therefore, the right of the people (the state) to keep (maintain an armed a militia militia) and of the people (as active members of a state's legitimate militia) to  bear arms (render service in an armed, government-controlled militia) shall not be violated by the federal government without due cause.

That's what the Second Amendment really sats, local5th.

 

[Local5th]

It says what it says Hawk.

And we finally got it right.

[duke_john]

Local, don't you agree that hawkie is just a bit touched?

[Local5th]

 

[wmdn_bs]

The Second Amendment is just what it says. The amendment isn't that long. If the FF meant for it to be something other than what it says I'm sure they had enough ink in the well, and probably didn't get writers cramp from such a short paragraph.

[duke_john]

^^^^ Yes ^^^^

[sine-qua-non]

To: sine-qua-non

in re: reply #62

A photo purportedly displaying a gun warning below a “Welcome to Idaho” sign has been circulating on the Internet on blogs, message boards, and via email since at least 2013. While the “Welcome to Idaho” sign is real, the gun warning included with it is not.

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/welcometoidaho.asp[/COLOR]]http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/welcometoidaho.asp

https://www.truthorfiction.com/idaho-sign-warns-crooks-gun-owners/[/COLOR]]https://www.truthorfiction.com/idaho-sign-warns-crooks-gun-owners/

https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/08/14/idahoroadsign/[/COLOR]]https://fellowshipoftheminds.com/2014/08/14/idahoroadsign/

http://wafflesatnoon.com/welcome-idaho-gun-warning-sign/[/COLOR]]http://wafflesatnoon.com/welcome-idaho-gun-warning-sign/




You mean This photo?

The one my wife took with My Camera in Idaho

Bwahahahahaha!! 
Notice the photo caption is photo #0009 on my camera !!!

You are such a tool of the morons I hate to expose your lunacy here but it's just toooo funny self confessed babykiller booboo !!!

[1965hawks]

sine-qua-non: You mean This photo?

Yep. The one that's one, sine-qua-non.! The one that was altered. You know--altered.

The one my wife took with my Camera in Idaho?

No, sine-qua-non. The photo-shopped one you posted because you were fooled by another lying gun nut, you lying asshole.

Bwahahahahaha!  Notice the photo caption is photo #0009 on my camera.

No. I didn't notice that, you lying piece o' shit.

You are such a tool of the blah blah blah blah blah....

Shut the fuck up and stick your head back up your ass where you usually keep it, sine-qua-non. Nobody's really interested in the lies you're telling here.

[wmdn_bs]

What does a caption have to do with anything?

[1965hawks]

Where's the caption?

[wmdn_bs]

I was merely following Sine's lead. He mistakenly believes a file name to be a caption.

[1965hawks]

So you didn't see it either. Huh, wmdn_bs? That proves again that sin-qua-non is one of our forum's right-wingnut, bald-faced, liars.