Presidential Golfing Superbowl

[captain_kook]

On most of his outings, Obama golfed alone.

The Andrews Air Force Base golf course isn't exactly on a par with Mar a Lago either,
and was a lot less expensive to use.

[D2D]

Obama was so aloof the refused to golf with other people?

Seriously!

[1965hawks]

To: D2D

in re: Reply #7

After another busy week of failure, Trump goes golfing again.

http://yanoonews.com/opinions/after-a-busy-week-of-failure-trump-goes-golfing-again.DApUW1RZW1MBBAwCUVVWVgMLXwECVlcB.html#Pj2spw6H6iSXYh3f.97

[D2D]

An opinion page?

Seriously?

1965hawks plumbs the depths of ridiculousness in a feeble effort to slam President Trump!

[1965hawks]

D2D: An opinion page?

Yes.

Seriously?

Yes!

1965hawks blah blah blah blah....

D2D, your logical fallacies are Genetic Fallacy and the Ad Hominem Fallacy.

D2D, evidently, you still don't get it: attacking the origin of an argument--rather than attacking the argument itself--or attacking the person making an argument--rather than attacking the argument itself--does not refute a persons argument.

[D2D]

An opinion without facts to back it up is nothing more than meaningless blather!

[1965hawks]

D2D: An opinion without facts to back it up is nothing more than meaningless blather.

D2D, explain why you continue to present opinionated, meaningless, blather rather than present fact-based arguments based on and supported by rational logic and sound reasoning. And after you do that, provide evidence that will refute the claims made in the articles I provided for the forum's perusal.

   

[D2D]

Everything I post is based on facts!

I link to my sources!

Do you?

[duke_john]

"Blathering" is what hawkiepoo does best.

[1965hawks]

D2D: Everything I post is based on facts. I link to my sources.

You're a bald-faced liar, D2D!

Case in Point:

"President Trump accomplishes more in half an hour than Obama did in an entire week."
___D2D, "Fake News Alert from FOX," reply #8.

D2D, the critical reader immediately recognises your ludicrous assertion as a statement of opinion but not a statement of fact. What you did in the sentence above was to commit the logical fallacy of arguing your unsupported opinion as fact.  And, of course, and for obvious reasons, you did not provide a hyperlink to a credible source to substantiate your opinionated assertion. So both your fallacious claims have been refuted, and for the umpteenth time, you've been exposed as one of this forum's biggest fabulists.

[duke_john]

Good work, D2D, you have hawkiepoo confused and blathering away.   

[D2D]

Prove me wrong, 1965hawks!