How can anyone be a civil rights leader and be a democrat~?

[dont-blameme]

So why do those so called civil rights leaders call themselves leaders when they belong to and support the party that has kicked their people to the curb for so many years, and has them living in crime ridden and drug infested hell holes~?

Well maybe ya need to follow the money on that one as well, the so called black leaders appear to be doing rather well~!

[gwboolean]

I can you answer Comrade Diddly.  Because every single one of them know that you and your TrEA$on party Comrades hate them and intend to stick it to them.  That appears to be obvious to everyone but you Comrade Diddly.

[Truman62]

Blammie believes the Fake News crowd and the revisionists.
He also refuses to study real history and just makes shit up.

[jst-the-fax]

Davik,
You are obviously a democrat...so my question is: Since the passage of the Great Society in 1965, Black Americans have seen their family unit destroyed, their schools turned into crap, their children aborted or turned into gang members. And their home relegated to the ghetto. So can you say you're proud of your party's help for black Americans?

[gwboolean]

What Comrade Jizz leaves out of his Treatise describing the condition of blacks today leaves out some critical information and completely invalidates his conclusion.  The first is that his description of blacks does not fit the majority of blacks.  The second is that since the passage of the Great Society in 1965 the TrEA$on party (alis the Republican party) has for the most part controlled all 3 branches of our government.
Were Comrade Jizz's conclusion correct then the responsibility for that would fall on the TrEA$on party (alias Republican party).

[duke_john]

I've never seen so many lies in one short statement from anyone before bool the fool posted that boolshit.

Well, I did see shit like that in every Hillary speech.

[1965hawks]

To: don't-blameme, jst-the-fax, and duke_john

in re: Democrats and civil rights

With Republicans having trouble with minorities, some like to point out that the party has a long history of standing up for civil rights compared to Democrats. Democrats, for example, were less likely to vote for the civil rights bills of the 1950s and 1960s. Democrats were more likely to filibuster. Yet, a closer look at the voting coalitions suggests a more complicated picture that ultimately explains why Republicans are not viewed as the party of civil rights.

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/28/republicans-party-of-civil-rights

[jst-the-fax]

Davik,
No comment?

[1965hawks]

jst-the-fax: No comment, Davik?

To: jst-the-fax, don't-blameme, and duke_john

Comment on the following article:

http://www.npr.org/sections/codeswitch/2014/07/14/331298996/why-did-black-voters-flee-the-republican-party-in-the-1960s