Media Rigged The Debate! ILLary Was NOT Asked About Conceding!!

[sweetwater5s9]

Hillary will not be pleased if she loses.   Look for her to bitch since she thinks she has the election rigged in her favor.

[WWV10MHZ]

The question remains!!!!

WHY WAS ILLary NOT ASKED THE SAME QUESTION? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?

[wmdn_bs]

Because Trump used up the allotted time for both of them, and shocked Wallace and the entire audience with his anti-American answer.

[WWV10MHZ]

WRONG!!

They are supposed to ask EACH Candidate the SAME QUESTIONS.

They do not go on UNTIL EACH CANDIDATE answers the SAME QUESTION!!!

That is the way the Commission on Debates set the RULES.

[wmdn_bs]

Actually, she was asked the same question. Maybe you turned it off after Trump gave his un-American answer. Hillary was given the same amount of time. If you recorded it, go back and watch it again.

[WWV10MHZ]

Well, I just watched it again for the 5th time.

At 1:05:30, the previous question ends and Wallace directs the Endorsement Question to Mr. Trump.

Trump gives his answer about seeing what happens, not committing himself before things are truly finalized.

ILLary begins talking about Trump whining/complaining, etc. until about 1:10:00 when Wallace begins with a new question.

She never comes close to giving an answer and the 15 minutes per question, according to the Rules, became less than 5 minutes!

On previous questions, Wallace pressed the Candidates to reply to the actual questions when they strayed. Why not this time? ? ? ? ?

There's ONLY ONE conclusion -----  RIGGED!!!!!

[wmdn_bs]

I suggest a a nice bake brie to go with your whine.

[bluespower]

wmdn_bs                      “The rifle itself has no moral stature, since it has no will of its own."                          Sr. Member                          Posts: 24561                          Bob

Re: Media Rigged The Debate! ILLary Was NOT Asked About Conceding!!                            « Reply #11 on: 10 20, 16, 07:02:38:PM »                                                                                  That doesn't even make sense Dan. Gore is the only one that needed to concede, and he did.

gore did not concede when the first vote was counted and posted...when bush won the electoral vote.
gore contested florida and took it to the supreme court...5 months later he lost the decision and then conceded.

I think this is what trump is basically saying...i'll tell you when there aren't any more extenuating circumstances.

[wmdn_bs]

I believe all states have a provision for close vote counts, just as Florida did. The hanging chad controversy gave rise to contested recounts. If it is that close, I agree Trump should pursue it. That is not what he said, and you can believe what you like about what he meant.

[bluespower]

florida "provisions" (whatever that means) and a close vote count had nothing to do with it.
on the first go around florida awarded the state to bush...case closed...bush wins.

gore made the claim that misreprsented hanging chads distorted the original count and challenged it to the supreme court.

what if gore had been asked 3 weeks before the election the question (a baiting red herring question): will you accept the results of the election?
and gore said: not until I challenge the outcome all the way to the supreme court.

[wvit1001]

Well, trumps have a whole day to clarify his answers on that question. What did he say about it? The only thing I have heard him say is that he Would onely protested be lost.

[Truman62]

Point is, Hillary will concede if Trump rigs the election to win.
Of course I've heard that MOST people don't want to hear his whines anymore...
And 4 more years of Donnie T whining about anything and everything could be
too much for someone...