Murders up 11% under 0bama

[wvit1001]

â€

[sweetwater5s9]

For a frisk, reasonable suspicion must justify the stop, and that the suspect is armed and dangerous. The government must show two reasonable suspicion types for a frisk:

    A reasonable suspicion criminal activity may be afoot before the stop
    A reasonable suspicion someone may be armed and dangerous, before the frisk


http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/your-search-and-seizure-rights-stop-and-frisk.html

[lluke47]

liberals are reactive instead of pro-active, this gets people killed. But like I said, let them kill each other..

[wvit1001]

[wvit1001]

[wxzyw]

Judge Shira Scheindlin... was found to be a typical liberal activist judge who was so biased against Cops that she was removed from the case... her corrupt decision would have been vacated with a scorching rebuke from the Appellate court ...

OBTW....... Judge Shira Scheindlin was removed from the bench shortly after!


We can always count on the left to lie and spin to their corrupt agendas, can't we?

[sweetwater5s9]

This has nothing to do with immigrants who must carry their green card on them for 5 years, wvit.  You are confused.


The Supreme Court defined a frisk as a carefully limited search for weapons, limited to someone's outer clothing. To justify a frisk, an officer needs reasonable belief that the stopped person may be armed and dangerous.

Reasonable suspicion can be based on:

    Facts seen and interpreted by police, light of training and experience
    Informants' tips
    A profile, such as a drug courier or gang member profiles
    Information shared by police departments
    Presence in a high crime neighborhood
    Unprovoked flight after seeing police
    Information gathered during a voluntary encounter

http://criminal.lawyers.com/criminal-law-basics/your-search-and-seizure-rights-stop-and-frisk.html


I thought you wanted to stop illegal guns and criminals who violate gun laws while protecting the innocent, wvit?   Why have you changed your mind?

[wvit1001]

we should be looking at stopping illegal guns at the source don't you agree sweaty?   Once a person has them it's just about too late.  The real question is how did that person get the gun in the first place?  He/she didn't just buy it at the gun store did they? 

[D2D]

Wvit, why is it your solution to every problem involve bigger government stripping the law abiding of their rights?

Wvit keeps goose stepping along!

[wvit1001]

I'm not the one promoting unwarranted stops and searches, that would be your buddy sweaty and the other goofs.

[D2D]

Actually you are!

In seeking the gun regulations you do, you are advocating the government have unlimited search and seizure powers!

[sweetwater5s9]

I thought you wanted to stop illegal guns and criminals who violate gun laws while protecting the innocent, wvit?   Why have you changed your mind?

They are the source...