WTF is 0bama doing

[duke_john]

 

Now Bernie is known as Bernie the doormat!

Bernie suddenly had the cash to purchase a third house once he backed out.  It reminded me of how the "not just dead broke, but in debt" Clintons could purchase a pricey home in an upscale NY neighborhood.

BTW, D2D, discussing an issue with bs is a useless endeavor.

[wmdn_bs]

D2D, thank you once again for proving my point, and now the president of your fan club shows up to help you. You must be proud. They grow up so fast, don't they? Maybe not this one, but most do. I am sure this prediction you are touting is almost as accurate as your prediction of Bernie Sanders running as a third party candidate.

[duke_john]

You are delusional, bs.  Seek mental help.

[1965hawks]

Most intelligent people have come to realize that it’s foolish to use only a single resource to determine the accuracy of a given story.--Stephen Frasier

Sorry, wxzyw, but your citing Mr. Frasier doesn't even come close to refuting the claim made by Snopes.com. Truth is, if you were really as intelligent as you would have this forum believe, you would had realised the foolishness of what you posted above and would had never used it. 

[sweetwater5s9]

We should all be paying attention to what this man who served our country honorably and trained in this type of civilian control has to say.

http://allnewspipeline.com/New_Year_Heads_Up_FEMA_Warning.php

[duke_john]

Considering the ridiculous sources you cite to back up your nonsense, hawk, you should be the last one to talk.

[1965hawks]

duke_john: Considering the ridiculous sources you cite to back up your nonsense, hawk, you should be the last one to talk.

Considering the ridiculous sources you cite to back up your nonsense, you, hawk, should be the last one to talk.
Considering the ridiculous sources you cite to back up your nonsense, you should be the last one to talk, hawk.

duke_john,

 What's really ridiculous is your calling calling Snopes.com ridiculous, simply because of the inability of you and wzyxw to provide factual evidence to refute that website's thorough debunking of the preposterous claim made by the internet hoax that wzyxw used to begin this thread. Considering the fact that neither you nor wzyxw have yet to present any credible evidence to substantiate the nonsensical claim that began this thread, it's really you and wzyxw who should immediately stop talking.

LOL

[wxzyw]

hawks, there is one thing we can't help you with... your stupidity. It's a incomprehensible thing for you to see the truth that 0bama is a piece of shit who would plot against America... he has done it through out his term... and your stupidity is priceless.



Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger
Posted By Peter Hasson On 8:57 PM 06/17/2016 In | No Comments

Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing fake quotes and even downright hoaxes as much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.

She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of voting to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included Benghazi at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 Benghazi attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active voter registration status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”

In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on fake news sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”

One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing inequality,” wasn’t actually about income inequality.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/06/17/fact-checking-snopes-websites-political-fact-checker-is-just-a-failed-liberal-blogger/#ixzz4Il5Vittq

[wxzyw]

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/04/snopescom/

[KensanIV]

Obama will NEVER succeed in establishing Martial Law in this nation.  Yes, no doubt he has purged many senior military officers who have disagreed with him over the years... I would bet that the number if upwards of 100... Mostly for the reasons that they disagreed with him.

If a 2nd Lt. in the rear ranks (as I was) disagreed with LBJ, he made certain their asses ended up in Nam...It really didn't matter, if you went with him or not... You still ended up there.

   Me, I bought into the whole need to pick up where the French left off in Nam... and Yes.... It happened to a lot of us.  For many of us it didn't matter as even those who agreed with him... We were too far down the line of authority or responsibility for anybody to worry about.

That is NOT the facts today... If you are field or above... He knows about you and will do whatever is necessary to get you out of his hair so to speak.  Many Many good officers are forced into retirement just because the don't agree with the CIC.

No!!!!! in fact, He will never declare martial law.  The American Public will never allow it.  He is NOT that dumb.

[duke_john]

Oh, lookie!  hawkiepoop is correcting sentences again.  He is so brilliant...for an idiot.

[caserio1]

with republican wackos threatening insurrection , obama would be derelict in his duty as cinc not to

prepare for the nut brigade