Court: No right to carry concealed weapons in public

[dont-blameme]

Unless you're buying or selling illegal drugs you chances of being involved in a violent crime is for all practical purposes zero.

Wvit seems to know a lot about that doesn't he?

Matter of fact he's made that same statement several times!
Any excuse to disarm the citizen is ok with wvit, as long as it's a law abiding citizen going in the body bag, and not the criminal!

[DaBoz]

Unless you're buying or selling illegal drugs you chances of being involved in a violent crime is for all practical purposes zero.

Cars jacking at gun point is a daily occurrence. Store hold ups are more often.. that statement holds no water.

[wvit1001]

they happen on a daily basis boz?  have you been involved in either in your long life?

[wvit1001]

<a href="https://www.youtube.com/v/sibOGNX-n0M" target="_blank">https://www.youtube.com/v/sibOGNX-n0M</a>

[sine-qua-non]

The 9th circuit holds the record for overturned decision

I wouldn't take them that seriously especially in the light of other court decision and the 2nd amendment
which is plainly written the right "shall not be infringed" upon that even a mental case like nitwit should be able to understand

[Baretta19]

you don't have to carry at all if you don't want to dan.  Unless you're buying or selling illegal drugs you chances of being involved in a violent crime is for all practical purposes zero.
 
I hope and pray you and every liberal on this board suffer that "near zero" better yet, I hope and pray you are called to identify the body of your loved one from that "near zero"

[Sadie402]

Re: Court: No right to carry concealed weapons in public

« Reply #1 on: Today at 03:57:05 PM »

There is no stopping a board hog with no guilt or conscience.



DaBozo has finally fallen off the precipice of sanity......

[Jw2]

2nd Amendment Does Not Guarantee Right to Carry Concealed Guns, Court Rules


well sine...because your Republicans in the US Senate don't want to hold hearings for the Supreme Court opening...a 4-4 vote (likely) on this matter will effectively leave that ruling stand.


try and pay attention.

[Jw2]

poor DaBox...take your gun and become a statistic.

[sine-qua-non]

What and when are the Supreme Court voting on JW?

So far the've upheld gun rights

Apparently it's you who has no clue

[wvit1001]

no, so far they've upheld gun regulations.

[sine-qua-non]

What regulation?

They told DC that they can't ban guns, and told San Diego they had to issue concealed carry permits
that they weren't doing, also they ruled against the state of socialist Calif for trying to ban concealed and open carry
which essentially would have nullified the 2nd amendment.

As JW said to me in another post ... " try to pay attention"