Oregon Patriots Now Treasonous Dogs!

[D2D]

Then you would punish all who occupied government buildings to protest government actions the same way?

[wmdn_bs]

Yes, if done by force and held by use of firearms.

[keep-left]

[D2D]

All building occupations are forceful!

Then you would imprison the unions that forcefully occupied statehouses?

You would imprison those who occupied government buildings to protest the Vietnam war?

You would imprison those who occupied government property denying the public use of it?

If not you are a hypocrite!

[wmdn_bs]

Did they hold them by the threat of using firearms?  Can you read, or do you just choose not to? Pethaps you attention deficit disorder prevents you from retaining the information you read long enough to respond. Pity that.

[D2D]

Under the law there is little difference as far as choice of weapon is concerned!

You claiming there is a difference only proves your hypocrisy!

[wmdn_bs]

D2D claims there is no difference between sitting passively and threatening with firearms. Bizarre!

[scott_free]

dvd cannot be talked to.  too stupid.  words and logic mean nothing.  he gives brainwashed pavlov's dogs a bad name. 

[Byteryder]

WMD, fire arms represent the threat force.  A mob of a few hundred is a threat of force as well.

Force is force

[wvit1001]

not according to our laws.  crimes committed with a gun are most always punished more harshly than the same crime without a gun.

[wmdn_bs]

A group of protesters passively participating in a sit in does not compare to a gang of armed thugs attempting to steal land from the public.

[Byteryder]

True. But the nature of the punishment does not change the nature of the act.  Force is force.