'MUSLIM-FREE ZONE': GUN-SHOP OWNER WINS CASE

[natalukjoe]

A lawsuit filed by a Muslim activist organization against a Florida firearms retailer who posted a “Muslim Free Zone” sign has been dismissed and the case ordered closed because the statement was protected by the First Amendment and the activists couldn’t show they were injured.



Read the latest now on WND.com.

[HK91-762mm]

  Yeaaayyyy  -- Good call !! 

[D2D]

That is a surprise!

I am sure that gun shop will soon be bombed by the Islamofascists!

It may well be inevitable!

[scott_free]

I would love to see the muslims all get together, go to that store and hang around pretending to be looking at the penis substitutes on display there and dare one of those rednecks to do anything about it.  It is true just posting a sign proving what a dumbass pig you are is not against the law, but if the stupid ass bigoted gun shop owner tried TO ENFORCE IT, then he would be breaking the law.  The muslims need to find a good guy cop, ask him to go with them to the gun store without his uniform on, off duty, so he can be a witness if the bigoted chickenshit gun owner tries to break the law.  And the muslims need to dress up as muslim as possible, just to piss off the wimpy gun nuts. 

[Local5th]

so he can be a witness if the bigoted chickenshit gun owner tries to break the law.

I don't believe it's against the law for a dealer to refuse to sell a weapon to anyone they suspect shouldn't have it. But, I guess you could change the laws to make it easier to sell guns if it bothers you.

[scott_free]

Are you serious?  You think a gun shop owner can just pick and choose who he sells guns to?  Are you on drugs?  A private seller, sure.  Have you been conscious for the last 60 years or so, even for a little while?

[sweetwater5s9]

The decision was released by U.S. District Judge Beth Bloom in a case brought by a local chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations against Florida Gun Supply

AFLC Senior Counsel David Yerushalmi said, “This dismissal was yet another AFLC victory against CAIR and its jihadi lawfare against patriotic Americans across the country. This victory follows on the heels of a recent victory against CAIR in a Michigan federal court where CAIR’s subpoenas were quashed and CAIR’s nefarious client sanctioned for abusive practices.”

He continued, “CAIR was born from a jihadi terrorist conspiracy, and it has done little to distance itself from those bona fides. CAIR is on notice: if you attempt to use the courts to conduct your civilizational jihad, AFLC will be there to defend law-abiding, patriotic Americans and our nation’s national security. We will match and defeat your civilization jihad with our constitutional lawfare in every courtroom across the nation.”

CAIR Florida had filed the action against Florida Gun Supply in July after its owner declared in a YouTube video his retail store is a “Muslim Free Zone.”

That followed the terrorist attack in Chattanooga, Tennessee, where five service members were gunned down. At that time, Muhammad Youssef Abdulazeez, 24, who was born in Kuwait, was accused of killing four U.S. Marines and a U.S. Navy petty officer during a shooting rampage. Abdulazeez also died.


The store owner, Andy Hallinan, explained he would refuse to equip the next Paris-type terrorist with dangerous firearms. Consequently, pursuant to its official, written policy, Florida Gun Supply will not serve �

AFLC reported, “Despite Hallinan’s legitimate concerns about public safety – concerns which have been confirmed most recently with the deadly terrorist attacks in France and the claims by ISIS to engage in similar attacks here in the United States – CAIR Florida sued Florida Gun Supply in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, alleging religious discrimination.”

AFLC Co-Founder Robert Muise said, “As our motion and now the court’s ruling make clear, CAIR’s lawsuit was patently frivolous if not outright dangerous. No firearms dealer or gun range owner for that matter should be required to sell weapons to or train anyone that the dealer or owner has reason to believe is a terrorist threat. We all have a civic responsibility to prevent the next terrorist attack. CAIR’s lawsuit was an effort to prevent business owners from doing so.”

The court ruled that CAIR “insufficiently alleged imminent harm. The complaint contains only bald, conclusory allegations devoid of factual enhancement.”

The ruling continued, “There are simply no facts grounding the assertion that [CAIR] and/or one of its constituents will be harmed.”

It also cited the First Amendment.

[scott_free]

This decision, if it is accurately described, will be overturned.  There are far more instances in this country of white boy domestic terrorism than muslim.  If they dumbass gun shop owner was honestly trying to single handedly stop terrorists from buying guns, he would not sell to white boys.  Do you silly ass right wingers really want a society where companies have the right to judge you before they sell anything to you?  And what happened to your basic, standard, NRA endorsed gun nut arguments - Guns don't shoot people, they are no more dangerous than a cellphone.  Or the other one- Even if you ban them, they will get them someplace else.  Or another one- more people are killed by clubs and fists than by assault weapons and rifles.  Why are you discarding your usual old, stupid arguments to now be in favor of gun control, strict gun control, NO GUNS AT ALL, for anybody any store owner just THINKS look muslim or black or mexican or "dangerous?"  How can something so patently unconstitutional and retarded make sense to you slugs?

[sweetwater5s9]

Your anti-white boy rants are moot in this case and ruling.   You lose.

[Jw2]

like HK wouldn't sell a gun to anyone with cash.

[D2D]

Law abiding gun owners save a minimum of 392,500 lives annually!

Proving guns are not a public health problem but a contributor to good public health!

An average minimum of 1075 lives are saved by law abiding gun owners every day!

Fact: Every year, people in the United States use guns to defend themselves against criminals an estimated 2,500,000 times – more than 6,500 people a day, or once every 13 seconds.243 Of these instances, 15.7% of the people using firearms defensively stated that they "almost certainly" saved their lives by doing so.
Firearms are used 60 times more often to protect lives than to take lives.




243 Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Kleck and Gertz, Fall 1995
http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6853&context=jclc
Reply

[scott_free]

Your goofy gun nut stat is as goofy as your stupid ass 42% unemployment rate stat.  You are an idiot.  You are so stupid and gullible you believe everything but the truth.  If more guns in society, either at home or in public or both, meant less homicides and gun deaths, then this country would not have about 4 times the rate of homicides and gun deaths as the next most dangerous, homicide-wise, modern country in the world.  Do you even begin to see how stupid you are?