Global Temperatures Continue to Surge in Record-Breaking October

[1965hawks]

chuck_curtis: The “pause” in global warming observed since 2000 followed a period of rapid acceleration in the late 20th century.

To: chuck_curtis

in re: "pause"

There is no substantive evidence for a 'pause' or 'hiatus' in global warming and the use of those terms is therefore inaccurate, new research from the University of Bristol, UK has found.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/11/151124081510.htm

[wxzyw]

For idiots who can't think for themselves.... they should be leery of where they get their info from.

[1965hawks]

KensanIV: So its hotter[.] That will give parts of our country a longer growing season. Can that be all bad?

To: KensanIV

in re: The insinuation that global warming is not all that bad.

http://www.skepticalscience.com/global-warming-positives-negatives.htm

[wxzyw]

Bravo hawks!

You ignore me with the same stupidity you ignore the real facts regarding MMGW... you simply can't handle the truth.

[chuck_curtis]

It's not getting warmer everywhere on the planet, particularly in the southern polar region where the average temperature has hardly changed at all, as deniers of the 1500-cycle incorrectly claim.  Data shows that to be consistent with past 1500-cycles.  Greenhouse warming theory, however, incorrectly predicts a greatest temperature increase at the poles. 

[1965hawks]

chuck_curtis: It's not getting warmer everywhere on the planet, particularly in the southern polar region where the average temperature has hardly changed at all, as deniers of the 1500-cycle incorrectly claim.

To: chuck_curtis

in re: Global warming in Antarctica (the solar polar region).

http://www.mapsofworld.com/antarctica/information/global-warming.html 

[chuck_curtis]

Invalid arguments are made when denying/ignoring data.  The temperature increase in the southern polar region is lower than anywhere else on the planet, which conflicts with greenhouse theory of warming.

[1965hawks]

chuck_curtis: Invalid arguments are made when denying/ignoring data.

It comes as no surprise that you would make that assertion, chuck, since that's exactly what you're doing here.

Now deny this:

http://www.coolantarctica.com/Antarctica%20fact%20file/science/global_warming.php

Or you can simply ignore it like you and your supporters in this forum are wont to do when confronted with factual evidence of anthrpogenic global warming and climate change.

[wxzyw]

NO FACTS OR VALID EVIDENCE ALLOWED!

Curtis, you not playing by the whacky rules hawks comes up with.... shame on you.

[chuck_curtis]

What can you expect from people who post links they like and don't answer to the points being made?  And then there are links denying the existence of a pause and some justifying its existence.  I guess is boils down to which ones you want to believe.  Me, I look at the data.

[1965hawks]

xwxzy321: hawks has no idea, I doubt if he ever had one, what the earth's normal temperature is!!! [sic]


xwxyz321,


You're continually babbling about Earth's normal temperature as if there's actually a normal temperature for this planet. If, in fact, there is such a normal temperature, then why don't you ever cite it? Could it be that Earth really doesn't have a "normal" temperature and you're just talking out your ass like you always do? I suspect that's really what you're doing here. Isn't that right, xwxzy321?

[sine-qua-non]

who is faking 400+ppm co2 levels (and rising with no end in sight over the next 50 to 100 years)...
verses 2 million year old and multiple inter glacial cycle warming maximums of 300 ppm?










Who?


If you have to ask you won't understan or believe that it's the AGW fraudsters!
And why do they do it?


  For the oldest reason on earth besides control ?, "For the Money"!!!!!!!!!