Why is it when a nut case or just a plain evil person commits a mass

[dont-blameme]

murder liberals rush to blame it on everything except the nut case or the evil person that done the deed? To what purpose or agenda does it serve the liberal to assign blame to what was not responsible for the act?

[darkflower]

Liberals trying to understand how to reduce repeats of the crime is not about blame. Blame is about criminal culpability and that is always with the perp.

Example. the Boston bombers are the only people culpable for the bombing, there is no blame for anyone or anything else. However, the war on terrorism did lead to that, and understanding that the war on terrorism creates terrorism rather than reduces it is good to know.

[dont-blameme]

darkweed made my point by blaming the war on terror for the Boston Bombing!

[darkflower]

I refuted your point. Your reading comprehension is terrible.

[dont-blameme]

dardweed said------>However, the war on terrorism did lead to that, and understanding that the war on terrorism creates terrorism rather than reduces it is good to know.
 
 
But she's not blaming the war on terror as the cause for the Boston bombing! Then what are you blaming it on weed?

[darkflower]

"the Boston bombers are the only people culpable for the bombing, there is no blame for anyone or anything else."

Your reading comprehension is terrible.

"Liberals trying to understand how to reduce repeats of the crime is not about blame."

Maybe blame is all you care about so you can not understand anything else?

[caserio1]

doan worry ms. flower intelligent people know blame is a dolt

[darkflower]

If you kill someone and a member of their family takes revenge by killing your family, you are obviously not to blame for killing your own family, the perp is. But your actions did LEAD to it.

[dont-blameme]

weed you are still assigning a point of blame!