Trolling Orgasm

[DaBoz]

I try to understand what you say boz but you make very little sense most of the time.

As others have asked:


What the fuck is your problem, Vit? Cant you engage in Board exchange without insulting, minimizing, impugning, accusing, denigrating, and trash talking the other posters??


I am not the fucking topic ,,,troll.. You and your God damn spamming and the above as answers to everything.. 

[wvit1001]

I don't have a problem boz.  You however, seem to have a very tenuous grasp on reality.


ten·u·ous - ˈtenyo͞oəs - adjective

very weak or slight.

[DaBoz]

As others have asked:


What the fuck is your problem, Vit? Cant you engage in Board exchange without insulting, minimizing, impugning, accusing, denigrating, and trash talking the other posters??

[takncarabizniz]

Seriously...

[wvit1001]

I like that tcb.  This crazy shit of denying what is clearly a problem and the reality of the cause is stupid.

[DaBoz]

Still waiting for your answer wvit?

http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/index.php?topic=208213.msg1656563#msg1656563

[wvit1001]

why don't you support our troops boz?  why do you want to see them being taken advantage of?

[DaBoz]

Why won't you address the ISIS Lies you told


http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/index.php?topic=208261.0


Your accusations about me and troops has no meaning , as they are your words,,,Not mine. My comment to caserrio can not be highjacked and changed for your use.

A fine example for all to note how a troll works

[wvit1001]

boz seems to want to revisit all the topics where I made him look foolish in the past. 

[DaBoz]

Those are that ones you ran away from and anyone can click on them and see that.


 YOU ARE NUTS MAKING THAT COMMENT

Do you think everyone is too stupid to check your word??


REQUEST FOR LINK to your claim that I do not support the troops will be added in your future posts.

[1965hawks]

emilyB: I wasn't on this CE Board very much so I didn't complain.

But even if you weren't here very much, you are admitting that you were here. Right, emilyB? And when you were here, I presume you noticed John's penchant for submitting a long list of posts, many of which he never bothered to respond to when a discussant replied. And if you didn't complain about John the Spam King, you have no business asking about the number of posts a discussant can post now. 

 I didn't complain this time either in case you hadn't noticed.

Yeah. I noticed, emilyB. And I presume you read what I posted above. And, by the way, Spammer John was quite active over on the eXcite message board too. Wasn't he, emilyB?

I just answered a post and made a comment.

And I just responded to your post and comment.

Where is John Adams anyway?

I don't know and could care less. Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.

Some people get their bird feathers ruffled real easy.

Yeah. I noticed the same thing too, emilyB.

[emilyB]

OK hawky - I have never seen John Adams on the Excite Board, where I used to hang out more than here, - so maybe I am just not very observant or he plain wasn't there and this post wasn't about John Adams until you brought him up.  I didn't complain about him on here and I didn't complain about wvit - I just asked if there was a limit to a number of posts anyone can make and made a suggestion.  I thought it was a good one - didn't ask for anyone to be banned.  If I said that I didn't like you because you were a mean, rude and cantankerous son of a bitch on this Board, then you could call that a complaint - so learn to comprehend, or in other words, don't read something into a post that isn't there.

I swear to high heaven hawky if you're not the late, not so great, pjveber, than you are her evil twin or you took lessons from her, as your style is identical.  JMO (just my observation).