Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
04 19, 24, 05:40:20:PM

Login with username and password

Biden Does NOT need a BILL to close the border
He only needs a PEN. Thats all he needed to open it.
Thats all he needed to close it. Thats all Trump needed.
Maybe this is just Proof Trump is better than Biden.

Search:     Advanced search
2660822 Posts in 298626 Topics by 306 Members
Latest Member: chachamukhtar
* Website Home Help Login Register
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: WH Rally v. Arctic Drilling: Global Warming Is 'Absolutely' ‘Settled S 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1  Print
Author Topic: WH Rally v. Arctic Drilling: Global Warming Is 'Absolutely' ‘Settled S  (Read 41 times)
wise1ray
Sr. Member

Posts: 16254


« on: 03 27, 15, 05:24:45:PM » Reply

WH Rally v. Arctic Drilling: Global Warming Is 'Absolutely' ‘Settled Science’ Despite Chief Scientist's Remarks


On Wednesday, marking the 26th anniversary of the catastrophic Exxon Valdez oil spill, protestors gathered in front of the White House to rally against oil drilling in the Arctic.

Among other organizations, Greenpeace USA sponsored the event, demanding that the government protect the Arctic, its wildlife, and the climate with further offshore drilling restrictions.

In light of recent remarks from Greenpeace USA co-founder and scientist Dr. Patrick Moore about his skepticism toward climate change, MRCTV’s Monica Sanchez asked participants a few questions about their cause.

“Science or no science, we see how warm it is. We see coastal properties falling off the sides of the Earth, essentially,” one activist retorted.

“It’s kinda the theory of everything. It’s putting all of these little bits of science together to come up with a new concept of how this world works,” another said.

Check out their responses below. 


In an article published just last weekend, Dr. Moore made the following statement:

“There is no scientific proof of this hypothesis, yet we are told ‘the debate is over’ and ‘the science is settled.’”
A leader in the international environmental movement for over 40 years, Dr. Moore laid out the reasons for why he is a climate change skeptic.

“Climate change has become a powerful political force for many reasons," he said. "First, it is universal; we are told everything on Earth is threatened. Second, it invokes the two most powerful human motivators: fear and guilt. We fear driving our car will kill our grandchildren, and we feel guilty for doing it. Third, there is a powerful convergence of interests among key elites that support the climate ‘narrative.’
“Environmentalists spread fear and raise donations; politicians appear to be saving the Earth from doom; the media has a field day with sensation and conflict; science institutions raise billions in grants, create whole new departments, and stoke a feeding frenzy of scary scenarios; business wants to look green, and get huge public subsidies for projects that would otherwise be economic losers, such as wind farms and solar arrays.”

“Fourth, the Left sees climate change as a perfect means to redistribute wealth from industrial countries to the developing world and the UN bureaucracy.”
Dr. Moore continued,

“So we are told carbon dioxide is a ‘toxic’ ‘pollutant’ that must be curtailed, when in fact it is a colorless, odorless, tasteless, gas and the most important food for life on earth. Without carbon dioxide above 150 parts per million, all plants would die.”
From their responses, participants at the rally clearly disagreed with the Greenpeace USA co-founder and chief scientist of Greenspirit Strategies. Organizers even claimed that they were not aware of Dr. Moore’s remarks.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BiV_Ad0GIus
wise1ray
Sr. Member

Posts: 16254


« Reply #1 on: 03 27, 15, 05:26:36:PM » Reply

Ok, then why are readings taken from outer space of the earth show no significant warming in the last 17 years? Why do we still listen to the computer models that predicted significant warming should have already occurred? Why did these same scientists come to the conclusion that 'convincing' evidence showed the earth cooling and the advent of a new ice age in the 70s?
upyrwazoo
Contributor
Sr. Member

Posts: 20552


« Reply #2 on: 03 27, 15, 08:43:18:PM » Reply

ONE THING TO REMEMBER ABOUT COMPUTERS IS THIS: GIGO
Pages: 1  Print 
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: WH Rally v. Arctic Drilling: Global Warming Is 'Absolutely' ‘Settled S
Jump to:  

AesopsRetreat Links


AesopsRetreat
YouTube Channel



Rules For Radicals.



2nd Amendment Source



5 minute Education




Join Me at KIVA
My Kiva Stats


Truth About
Slaves and Indians




r/K Theory




White Privilege




Conservatives:
What Do We Believe


Part 1:
Small Govt & Free Enterprise

Part 2:

The Problem with Elitism

Part 3:
Wealth Creation

Part 4:
Natural Law



Global Warming Scam



Lend a hand


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © AesopsRetreat
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.139 seconds with 28 queries.