Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
04 27, 24, 05:05:10:AM

Login with username and password

Biden Does NOT need a BILL to close the border
He only needs a PEN. Thats all he needed to open it.
Thats all he needed to close it. Thats all Trump needed.
Maybe this is just Proof Trump is better than Biden.

Search:     Advanced search
2663253 Posts in 298858 Topics by 307 Members
Latest Member: Carmelarom
* Website Home Help Login Register
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: A man for the peons 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4  Print
Author Topic: A man for the peons  (Read 214 times)
1965hawks
Sr. Member

Posts: 26544


« Reply #36 on: 02 03, 15, 02:38:15:PM » Reply

P

Chuckles The Right-Wingnut ass Clown wrote, "One thing she can't ignore is that her statists pals have have (sic) some competition in Washington, and that's what I'm here to point out.  It's no surprise she doesn't like him, or agree with him."

Chuckles,

The only thing you pointed out is that you're a right-wingnut ass clown, something you've already pointed out numerous times before. And, by the way, have you forgotten? A  statist is an advocate of statism and statism (also called stateism) is concentration of al economic controls and plannings in the hands in the hands of a highly centralized government. Why do you keep babbling about "statists?" Why haven't you done as I asked and explained what statism has to do with armed EPA agents in Alaska?
1965hawks
Sr. Member

Posts: 26544


« Reply #37 on: 02 03, 15, 02:51:50:PM » Reply

"Law enforcement officers in Alaska were feloniously killed by guns at a higher rate than all but two other states between 2002 and 2011."

I think you are full of shit Hawk. Show me the numbers, by year and by state, from a reliable source Hawk.

LIAR5th,

Explain why you believe attacking the arguer (ad hominem fallacy) refutes the arguer's argument. And instead of special pleading (moving the goal post after your claim was shown to be false), why don't you provide year-by-year and state-by-state-evidence that refutes the evidence I provided. And, finally, provide evidence to support your allegation that the evidence I provided didn't come from a reliable source, you lying piece of shit.
 
darkflower
Sr. Member

Posts: 23321


« Reply #38 on: 02 03, 15, 04:47:20:PM » Reply

Law enforcement being killed by guns does not mean epa need to be armed nor does it mean epa are likely to be shot. They are admin and inspectors, not cops.

And law enforcement in this country is out of control, too heavily armed, trained to be too aggressive, and too often murdering and terrorizing innocents. That is the result of decades of militarizing them and asking "what's best for the police" rather than "what's best for society." No knock is a perfect example of that.
Local5th
Sr. Member

Posts: 36971

God is Great Beer is Good and People are Crazy


« Reply #39 on: 02 03, 15, 06:03:02:PM » Reply

why don't you provide year-by-year and state-by-state-evidence that refutes the evidence I provided.

Here you go hawk. Year by year and state by state evidence that refutes your evidence.

[SIZE=3;]Alaska[/SIZE]
Avg. Annual Death Rate: 5.0 per 50,000 officers
5-Year Total Deaths: 2

Annual Rates
2012 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2011 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2010 Deaths: 2 (25.1 per 50,000 officers)
2009 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2008 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
Figures include both law enforcement and corrections officers.

http://www.governing.com/gov-data/law-enforcement-fatality-rates-by-state.html
1965hawks
Sr. Member

Posts: 26544


« Reply #40 on: 02 03, 15, 06:15:11:PM » Reply

LIAR5th,

The evidence I provided says that "Law enforcement officers in Alaska were feloniously killed by guns at a higher rate than all but two other states between 2002 and 2011."












 There's absolutely NOTHING in the crap you posted below that refutes that claim. Is it, shithead?

Avg. Annual Death Rate: 5.0 per 50,000 officers
5-Year Total Deaths: 2

Annual Rates
2012 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2011 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2010 Deaths: 2 (25.1 per 50,000 officers)
2009 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2008 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
Figures include both law enforcement and corrections officers.



















 
1965hawks
Sr. Member

Posts: 26544


« Reply #41 on: 02 03, 15, 06:15:11:PM » Reply

LIAR5th,

The evidence I provided says that "Law enforcement officers in Alaska were feloniously killed by guns at a higher rate than all but two other states between 2002 and 2011."












 There's absolutely NOTHING in the crap you posted below that refutes that claim. Is it, shithead?

Avg. Annual Death Rate: 5.0 per 50,000 officers
5-Year Total Deaths: 2

Annual Rates
2012 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2011 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2010 Deaths: 2 (25.1 per 50,000 officers)
2009 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
2008 Deaths: 0 (0.0 per 50,000 officers)
Figures include both law enforcement and corrections officers.



















 
Local5th
Sr. Member

Posts: 36971

God is Great Beer is Good and People are Crazy


« Reply #42 on: 02 03, 15, 06:52:13:PM » Reply

LIAR5th,

The evidence I provided says that "Law enforcement officers in Alaska were feloniously killed by guns at a higher rate than all but two other states between 2002 and 2011."


True. And my numbers show that between 2008 and 2011 Alaska only had 2 cop killings, both in the same year..

To be correct, using your numbers for 2008 -2011, there would of had to be zero to negative cop killing in other states for Alaska to have more cops killed at a higher rate than all but 2 states.

Explain that.
chuck_curtis
Contributor
Sr. Member

Posts: 69070

Let's go Brandon!


« Reply #43 on: 02 03, 15, 08:45:05:PM » Reply

Statism is not limited to collective economic policy and control.  Statism broadly includes collective social policy and control, in addition.   
1965hawks
Sr. Member

Posts: 26544


« Reply #44 on: 02 03, 15, 08:57:34:PM » Reply

Statism is not limited to collective economic policy and control.  Statism broadly includes collective social policy and control, in addition.   

Really? What definition are you citing, Chuckles? Truth be told, that sounds like something you just pulled out of your ass. And I suspect that's exactly what it is. Isn't that right, Chuckles the Ass Clown?

HAHAHA
chuck_curtis
Contributor
Sr. Member

Posts: 69070

Let's go Brandon!


« Reply #45 on: 02 03, 15, 09:00:57:PM » Reply

You're opinions are always entertaining, hawks.  But, that's all that they are.
Pages: 1 ... 3 4  Print 
 |  All Boards  |  Current Events  |  Topic: A man for the peons
Jump to:  

AesopsRetreat Links


AesopsRetreat
YouTube Channel



Rules For Radicals.



2nd Amendment Source



5 minute Education




Join Me at KIVA
My Kiva Stats


Truth About
Slaves and Indians




r/K Theory




White Privilege




Conservatives:
What Do We Believe


Part 1:
Small Govt & Free Enterprise

Part 2:

The Problem with Elitism

Part 3:
Wealth Creation

Part 4:
Natural Law



Global Warming Scam



Lend a hand


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © AesopsRetreat
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.113 seconds with 35 queries.