Too little too late, but better late than never.

[1965hawks]

Yeah, the jury was "duped" by a complete lack of evidence against him!

He got off on the technicality of being innocent!

D2D,
 
I've never tried to disprove the obvious fact of Zimmerman's acquittal. What I've always done and continue to do is produce evidence to support the argument that his acquittal allowed him to get away with murder. You and your fellow Zimmerman idol worshipers continually defend him and vociferously proclaim his innocence. I've provided evidence that easily pokes holes in his bogus self-defense claim. And, when confronted with that evidence, you and this forum's other members of the George Zimmerman fan club, can never refute or debunk it. All you can do is trot out the same old  lame excuse: The jury found him not guilty. Yes, the jury acquitted Zimmerman, but, evidently, neither you nor any of his supporters in this forum can defend that verdict against the evidence that clearly shows he got away with murder. No, D2D. The jury wasn't "duped;" the jury was misinformed and evidence that would had easily convicted Zimmerman was withheld from them. You and your fellow Zimmerman supporters were duped and it's obvious that you're still duped.

[duke_john]

Nope, hawkshit.  The jury was better informed than you.

Live with the verdict.

[1965hawks]

Nope, hawkshit.  The jury was better informed than you.

Live with the verdict.

doodoo_john,
 
The jury's acquittal is all the evidence needed to argue that it was misinformed and not allowed to hear testimony that would had easily convicted Zimmerman.
 
And you're confused again, dumbfuck_john. The issue here isn't whether I can live with the verdict; it's the fact that you or any other Zimmerman supporter in this forum can't defend it. All you can do is fall back on the same old lame excuse: The jury acquitted Zimmerman so, therefore, he's innocent, despite evidence that says otherwise. Zimmerman lied and got away with murder. It's way past time for you to accept that fact and live with it, deluded_john.
 
http://viewfromll2.com/2013/07/08/zimmermans-statements-are-the-defenses-own-worst-enemy/
 
http://friendsofjustice.wordpress.com/2012/06/25/capehart-zimmermans-story-doesnt-add-up/
 
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/06/george-zimmerman-reenactment-video
 
http://globalgrind.com/2012/06/21/george-zimmerman-reenactment-breakdown-lying-videos-trayvon-martin-sanford-florida-list/
 
 
 
 

[duke_john]

He received a fair trial and was declared not guilty.

Maybe in your country, it's done some other, bizarre way, but that's how we do it here, fool.

[sweetwater5s9]

There are plenty of opinions, hawky...  They mean little in a court of law...

[caserio1]

ding dong would have you believe martin was killed by friendly fire

or magic

[duke_john]

see?

cusserio is a dumbfuck lying troll

[D2D]

None of you has provided any evidence indicating Zimmerman's guilt!

[caserio1]

lemme see
 
there's gotta be a corpus delecti around here someplace
 
gimme a minute

[D2D]

The presence of a body is not proof of murder or guilt on anyone's part!

[caserio1]

you said NO evidence
 
a corpus delecti is evidence

[D2D]

See above!