POLL: Simple Question

[Jim]

Define "properly" vetted... 
 
You define it.  You're the one who doesn't care.
 

[Etc-ctE]

(( You define it.  You're the one who doesn't care. ))

Just what  I figured you would say.  So your baited Poll was just a ploy to draw in the left winger, so you could rag on them and call them names, even more so  than you already do.. 

I got it...

[dont-blameme]

Liberals dont care,as long as it's a person they agree with,he/she could be a child molester or a cold blooded killer as long as the politics agree with the liberal point of view.

[upyrwazoo]

SIMPLE UNCOMPLICATED ANSWER: YES FOR SECURITY REASONS AND EVEN THOSE ON THE LEFT WOULD BE SCREAMING IF OBAMA WAS ASSASSINATED BECAUSE SOMEONE WASN'T VETTED!!! AND YOU KNOW THAT'S TRUE. SO HOW THE HELL DOES A COUPLE OF ATTENTION whoreS GET TO WALK RIGHT INTO THE WHITE HOUSE DURING A STATE FUNCTION AND WHAT IF THEY HAD GUNS?? PLUS THE FACT THAT EVEN AIDES CAN OVERHEAR CONVERSATIONS INVOLVING SECURE INFO, SO IF YOU CAN'T PASS A BACKGROUND CHECK YOU SHOULD NOT BE WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT IN ANY CAPACITY!

[Jim]

 
So your baited Poll was just a ploy to draw in the left winger,
 
You think the Poll was baited?  It was a Yes or No question.   How was it baited?
 
 
 
so you could rag on them and call them names,
 
What name did I call you?
 
 
 
even more so  than you already do.. 

Give an example..
 



I got it...

Yep, you got "something", I won't argue that point!
 

[wxzyw]

The DOJ (FBI) vets for the Administration's Top Secret Clearance.

But, who is running the DOJ?  0bama wouldn't dismiss Holder because Holder knows 0bama's secret. Isn't it funny how the 0bama Administration dismiss, transferred, demoted the FBI, CIS NSA... department heads and replaced them with liberals and  _ _ _ _ _ _ ?

Funny, Bush fires a dozen DOJ attorneys and the whole world knows.

[dont-blameme]

Jim you should know by now any question that you ask that involves a liberal will be seen as baited.

[Etc-ctE]

 I have no desire to indulge in pissing contests with you right wing idiots.  When they learn to have civil discussions then maybe a discussion can be done. 

When i said "YOU" I meant all of you right wingers.

I made a statement.   You can take it or leave it.  If I'm wrong prove I'm wrong... 

[Jim]

I have no desire to indulge in pissing contests with you right wing idiots.  When they learn to have civil discussions then maybe a discussion can be done. 

This entire Topic "was" a civil discussion until your post.    And if you had no desire to indulge in a pissing contest then why did you unzip in the first place?
 
 
I asked a simply Yes or No question.  All it asked for was a simply Yes or No answer.  Is that what you did?
 
Again: Yes or No ?
 
 
 

[moneill16]

President and Vice President...  not wanting to pay for other Idiots that stupid people vote for

[Dardmex]

I voted "NO" because I believe that President Obama was already properly vetted before the 2008 presidential election and so there's really no need to do so today!
 
http://www.MoveOn.org ........ http://www.dailykos.com

[Jim]

President and Vice President...  not wanting to pay for other Idiots that stupid people vote for
 
How much does it cost to insure our secrets remain secret?  You don't want "anyone" else investigated?