Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
03 28, 24, 10:44:02:AM

Login with username and password

Biden Does NOT need a BILL to close the border
He only needs a PEN. Thats all he needed to open it.
Thats all he needed to close it. Thats all Trump needed.
Maybe this is just Proof Trump is better than Biden.

Search:     Advanced search
2653431 Posts in 297920 Topics by 308 Members
Latest Member: JerryEcold
* Website Home Help Login Register
 |  All Boards  |  Moved Hot Topics  |  Topic: Supreme court will ruled on healthcare law (Poll) 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Poll
Question: In which Favor will the Supreme Court Rule for ObamaCare?
100% Constitutional - 11 (23.9%)
100% Un-Constitutional - 21 (45.7%)
Constitutional Except for Mandate - 14 (30.4%)
Total Voters: 46

Pages: 1 2 ... 15 Print
Author Topic: Supreme court will ruled on healthcare law (Poll)  (Read 14120 times)
ttopcat
Sr. Member

Posts: 18590


« on: 06 27, 12, 04:15:39:PM » Reply

Tomorrow will be a big day on the unpopular healthcare law.
 
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-daily-rundown/47946414
moneill16
Sr. Member

Posts: 15705


« Reply #1 on: 06 27, 12, 04:20:29:PM » Reply

Wait till they take away pre-existing  conditions law,  college age kids on parents health care law

But the stakes are higher for the the tens of millions of Americans who lack access to health care. Fully overturning the Affordable Care Act would deny about 30 million uninsured Americans access to the health benefits that would have been provided under the health care reform starting in 2014. Invalidating health care reform also would eliminate consumer protections built into the law that would prohibit health insurance companies from refusing to cover people with pre-existing conditions, charging higher rates to women, kicking sick people off the rolls and setting lifetime limits on coverage of medical bills, among other practices permitted before the law took effect two years ago.
moneill16
Sr. Member

Posts: 15705


« Reply #2 on: 06 27, 12, 04:21:11:PM » Reply

Dems Ready To Push Single-Payer Option If Health Care Law Struck Down
ttopcat
Sr. Member

Posts: 18590


« Reply #3 on: 06 27, 12, 04:24:43:PM » Reply

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2012/06/25/health-law-decision-to-come-thursday/
chuck_curtis
Contributor
Sr. Member

Posts: 68566

Let's go Brandon!


« Reply #4 on: 06 27, 12, 04:26:35:PM » Reply

college age kids on parents health care law

College age kids that may have graduated from college, and/or may even have a good paying job of their own.   Time for them to get their own policy at full price.
Jim
When someone claims to have an Open Mind they are soon shocked, dismayed, and offended that there actually are other views.
Contributor
Sr. Member

Posts: 62173

What would they do without Anecdotals or Snark


« Reply #5 on: 06 27, 12, 04:29:36:PM » Reply

 
Is the poll correct? Should I have added something else or worded differently?
 
moneill16
Sr. Member

Posts: 15705


« Reply #6 on: 06 27, 12, 04:33:54:PM » Reply

Republican Senator Won’t Say Whether ACA Has ‘Death Panels’
moneill16
Sr. Member

Posts: 15705


« Reply #7 on: 06 27, 12, 04:34:30:PM » Reply

Poll: 65 Percent Of Massachusetts Voters Don’t Think Romney Is One Of Their Own
Dardmex
Sr. Member

Posts: 26230


« Reply #8 on: 06 27, 12, 04:37:12:PM » Reply

I fully agree with moneill16.
 
To rule against President Obama's wishes on this matter would be unpatriotic & probably racist, as well.
 
http://www.thedailykos.com ......... http://www.MoveOn.org



Low IQ? Socially conservative? You might be prejudiced, study says!
Oz
Sr. Member

Posts: 27517


« Reply #9 on: 06 27, 12, 04:37:35:PM » Reply

Is the poll correct? Should I have added something else or worded differently?


Who knows?  It's an opinion poll...
Byteryder
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Sr. Member

Posts: 32425

ante omnia armari


« Reply #10 on: 06 27, 12, 04:37:51:PM » Reply

There is no place for the Federal Government to dictate whom, and for how much, the must sell there services.
 
"Pre-existing Conditions" is not Insurance.  Insurance is payment, in advance, the amount determined by statistics, to cove the losses from an event that MIGHT occur  in the future.  Insurance is not to cover losses for events that have ALREADY occurred.
 
Now, you can Insure against re-occurrence and resulting new losses, although the cost would be prohibitive, but "insuring" against ongoing losses from and event that has already happened it not "insurance".
 
how is this hard to understand?
moneill16
Sr. Member

Posts: 15705


« Reply #11 on: 06 27, 12, 04:38:16:PM » Reply

May Kaiser Health Tracking Poll: Four in Ten Say Children and Young Adults Will Be Better Off
Pages: 1 2 ... 15 Print 
 |  All Boards  |  Moved Hot Topics  |  Topic: Supreme court will ruled on healthcare law (Poll)
Jump to:  

AesopsRetreat Links


AesopsRetreat
YouTube Channel



Rules For Radicals.



2nd Amendment Source



5 minute Education




Join Me at KIVA
My Kiva Stats


Truth About
Slaves and Indians




r/K Theory




White Privilege




Conservatives:
What Do We Believe


Part 1:
Small Govt & Free Enterprise

Part 2:

The Problem with Elitism

Part 3:
Wealth Creation

Part 4:
Natural Law



Global Warming Scam



Lend a hand


Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP © AesopsRetreat
Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.223 seconds with 39 queries.