i been gone for a couple of weeks was hoping to see that you had found the obama records that you claimed you had,but after running through all the post i see it just did'nt happen..

Never claimed to personally have any Obama records.  Just said I knew where you could see online that Harvard counts him as a student of theirs...  as does Columbia University.

Don't try to play semantics, parse words, shave frogs and split their fine hairs and make things something other than what they are.

Good old (and I mean old) 13 is spinning and deflecting and bobbing and weaving. 

I remember that as well...I do believe she said she had records of some sort...but since I don't save everything to my harddrive like she does, it would take an awful lot of searching to try and find the posts referring to that...
 
We do know what was said and that's really what matters...
 
 

Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and the appointment – and payments to one of his eligibility lawyers at a cost confirmed to be at least $1.7 million – of numerous lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation. That's in addition to the work done by U.S. defending Obama's eligibility, as in this case.



The following is information was compiled from the official Federal Elections Commission website for disbursements from the Obama campaign to the law firm of Perkins Coie, which is or did represent Obama in various eligibility suits. The FEC links follow the entries.

2nd Quarter, 2010, FEC report for Obama for America
Perkins Coie:  $248483.94
http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/501/10930598501/10930598501.pdf#navpanes=0 (http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/501/10930598501/10930598501.pdf#navpanes=0)

1st Quarter, 2010 Perkins Coie:  $261,206.69
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2010/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html)

October 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $314,018.06

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q3/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html)

July 2009 quarterly:
Perkins Coie:  $270,754.18

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q2/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q2/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html)

April 2009 quarterly
Perkins Coie:  $688,316.42

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.htm (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2009/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.htm)

Year-End 2008
Perkins Coie:  $173,052.52

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/YE/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html)

Amended post-general election:
Perkins Coie:  $205,323.00

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/30G/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html (http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2008/30G/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html)


that adds up to:  $2,161,155.11

Perkins Cole does not appear in the pre-general election filing or a few others checked randomly.  You are free to pursue any further information that is of interest. 

But one would assume that the official FEC website to which the Obama and other campaigns must report their financial activity would be taken by even the most skeptical among us as valid documentation of the reported $1.4 or $1.8, or anything in between, figure expended to defend the eligibility suits.

This information is about the legal fees only of that one law firm, not the DOJ attorneys, court time, or other related costs.



Wow!  He  R E A L L Y  doesn't want use to know he's officially a Kenyan, huh?

The onus is on the Kenyan to show what he's been hiding in HI and his passports too!
If he did that it would save the taxpayers and his reputation a win win for everyone, eh?

hey sine-d ... didja notice all the republican politicians who use the fake birth certificate to help them along for getting re- elected?
 
 
No?
 
 
 
enither has anyone else..
 
 
BBBBAAAAHHHHAAAAHHHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Stay out of it, takncara. 

You're nothing BUT a liar and the deal is that I'll stop telling the ugly TRUTH about you when you stop telling ugly LIES about me.

PROOF?  Where's the proof?

If you can't prove I said that please have the sense to STFU -- even though we know you don't have the decency, Lolita!

It's Friday and you're going to sleep in the gutter again there 13?
 
brilliant...absolutely brilliant...
 
The board knows what the truth is and who should be approached with caution and it ain't me sister...

What's with all this "old" person stuff? 

I'm 63 and supposedly many people in here are my age.  But that doesn't matter, it's how young a person is at heart and how young they are perceived to be.

Here: 

Well, as the Lone Lady might say:   *That ought to hold you varmints and cayooses for awhile!*
 
http://www.youtube.com/v/ETF9GU4M90k

how about the {obama records} "13" the ones you claimed you had..!! just think of all the attention you got from stateing you had the records,and now youre getting more attention for not being able to produce them..how big your head must be swolen..

 

Maybe you should heed your own words and prove that people said all those things about Sarah Palin.
 
Do you have the sense to STFU?  Or the decency to do so?
 
And maybe I should follow your lead and start a new thread with big letters to point out your continuing hypocrisy?  Whatcha think?

Never said that, dbm. 

And I have plenty of back up on that, too.

Give it up, gasbag.

Listen Thomas, I know you're too STUPID to understand English, or make distinctions of any kind, let alone fine distinctions but these are too different cases -- vastly different cases.

In the case of the Sarah Palin post, I posted a quote from an article and all the links pertaining to the article and related artice and a video -- all of which contain information which the authors collected, published and to which they attested.

NOT ME.  I SIMPLY BELIEVE what they are saying to be true, which is MY RIGHT TO DO.

I also have a right to post that quoted material so that people can read it and decide for themselves whether they think it's true or false.

I DON'T have to STFU, because I'm NOT swearing to the truth of anything I am exercizing my RIGHT to speech and belief about something one set of 3rd parties said about another.

And the documentation of them saying was provided by me.

IF YOU have a PROBLEM with the accuracy of what those journalists said, you take it up with them!

Now in this case, in this post here, with the Obama documents, your fellow RW *bleep*tard, dbm, is saying that I said something I didn't say and takncara is lying in agreement when neither of them have one iota of documentation that I said that, or that dbm didn't misinterpret what I said.

BIG DIFFERENCE. BIG, BIG, DIFFERENCE.

They are not talking about some 3rd party public figure, they are lying about ME personally, and I can tell them to prove it or shut up.

Can you see the difference? 

Have you got it yet, *bleep*tard?

Your lousy spew doesn't wash, its just the typical BS and prolongued harassment of a typical wretched ball of Right-Wing garbage.

Present for 13...
 
(http://farm1.static.flickr.com/212/524900480_f97cfb4eb4_o.gif)

No, no,  I wouldn't dream of taking your dinner, takncara...  you eat that big steaming pile all by yourself.

So it is okay to lie about someone else, 13ager.
 
Your hypocrisy is showing in full form again.

No.  Sarah Palin Is a public figure.

I'm a private citizen.

And you're a tiresome jerk and a wart on the ass of humanity.

Gotta go.  Got a show to watch with hubby.