https://www.yahoo.com/news/sean-hannity-facing-sexual-harassment-102644521.html

Debbie Schlussel, during an appearance Friday on the Pat Campbell Podcast, did not specify
when the incident took place but said she was never invited back to the channel after she
turned down Hannity’s advances.

“So then I left to get ready for the show and he said, ‘Why don’t you come back with me to
 my hotel?’ and I said no, I have to get ready for the show,” Schlussel added. The
conservative commentator added that Hannity invited her back to his room again after the
show, and that she declined again.

“And then after that, I wasn’t booked on a show again. And he called me and yelled at me,”
she said.

However, Hannity maintains the allegations have been fabricated and threatened to take legal
action against Schlussel.


Looks like Hannity is another sleazeball!
I guess he learned this from Ailes?

It's just the culture of FOX News.   Women are merely decoration at FOX.   Sometimes the decorations are allowed to speak, but not often.

I don't fuck my wall decor, or my Christmas decorations...  :P

She backed off, she lied, dimwits. That tactic must be ignored. When you are harassed you speak right away, not years or decades later.

Democrats see nothing wrong with making false accusations as long as it results in a conservative losing money or his job!

LOL!  So this is how the libs think they can silence their political rivals, huh?  Truly pathetic.

No.  It's the culture among liberals - to make false accusations about racism or sexism to try to silence their political opponents.

Where is your PROOF that the accusations are false?

Show us proof, or you could be sued for libel!

Prove the accusations are true!

Did you forget in America people are presumed innocent?

Then Hannity should sue her for Libel!

At least then Hannity would show us he has the guts to sue,
unlike the Fat Don, who threatened, but then backed off suing his accusers.
( He backed off, because he KNEW it was true! )
LOTS of smoke at FOX...  MUST be a fire somewhere...

You repocons MUST be sad, since your "Boys' Club" is going away.  :(

Pussy grabbing builds character.

Hannity is called many names by the scurrilous lefties.... but one thing he isn't is a sexual harasser... ah, the dem dreams shall now be stopped!

OBTW, look at who is falsely accusing Hannity... and who wants to desperately believe her.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IX7iJiJb360/hqdefault.jpg) 
[img width= height=]http://www.islamophobiatoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Schlussel.jpg[/img]

Seriously?  I doubt a drunken dem bum would want sex with her.

It proves to me what scumbags liberals are always trying to destroy people who don't believe the lying hateful shit liberals do..

Hi Luke... long time no see!

Well, it figures that the left, having claimed O'Reilly's scalp, would go after Hannity next.

I wonder what the late Alan Colmes would have said about all this, had he still been with us.  He was Hannity's close FRIEND despite their political differences.

ROFL - When Trumps lawyers get done with her she'll be living in a trailer, no network will touch her

 
WOW !! Somebody asked a girl if she wanted to come to his room!   OH MY GOD !!  Thats never EVER happened before!
What will we do?  What will we do, I say!
 
Oh the in-humanity of Hannity!



Now we see whats going on here. The Leftstream media are grabbing ANY female who was asked out on a date by a Fox employee and paid them money or made an offer for them to claim it was sexual harassment.  Because know the day and age we live in now, where you can't say BOO to a feminist female without being charged with attempted Rape.

Thanks to all the liberal pc bullshit and no conscience about how to destroy anyone they don't agree with, nice men, (and I mean 'gentlemen' with good manners and I'm married to one) are even reluctant to hold a door open for a woman, offer assistance if needed or shake hands on being introduced.  This is an observation that was just made to me and it's very sad!

poor jim...in the professional world, #1 that's a big no-no, particularly when it's the boss or someone with authority over the individual.

when the victim can demonstrate retaliation...that's where law suits are won.


poor jim...back in the day, companies (and the government) would have two workers - always male - share a hotel room.  When women became more prominent in the work force, corporate and government policy changed and we traveling executives now get our own rooms as standard policy.

This isn't "a liberal thing".  Youse people always frame everything from a conservative vs. liberal thing because you're ignorant fools.


I understand that you are ignorant.  But that's no excuse. 


the overwhelming vast majority of "conservatives" that I know find sexual harassment as offensive. It's a violation of practically every business and governmental organization.  It's illegal.  And youse phony "law-and-order" types are more than willing to abandon your phony principles for one of your own who got caught.

 
What makes you think she was "EVER" scheduled to return to the show?

 
IDIOTS



Debbie Schlussel says Sean Hannity was 'creepy,' but did not sexually harass her
 

Political commentator Debbie Schlussel has clarified comments she made about an encounter with Fox News talk show host Sean Hannity — saying he was “creepy” but did not sexually harass her.
 
 
http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-ct-schlussel-hannity-20170424-story.html

 

there's a fine line between harassment and "creepy".

too often, those in authority assumed it was just creepy...and they were wrong in many cases.

 
 Yeah, you're right. This lady has no idea what she's talking about - but you do on her behalf...  Nice...

Are you starting to get just a 'slight' sense of one of the many reasons why the Left lost the election yet?

Where is your proof that I am wearing a blue shirt?  You made the accusation, I don't have to prove a negative.  YOU have to prove the positive.  YOU have to prove your accusations are true.  I don't have to do a damned thing.  Because in our system of justice, the accused is presumed innocent until the accuser can provide proof.


I don't have to.  I didn't make the accusation.  YOU have to show us proof, or you could be sued for libel!

He is indeed!

Not in Bill Clinton's case.

And it didn't happen with Hannity either, Jim.  Don't believe the lie.  Hannity is a happily married man and a devout husband.  He would never do anything inappropriate like that.  He avoids the appearance of impropriety like the plague.

Now Lawrence O'Donnell, on the other hand, I can see him propositioning subordinates for sexual favors.

Poor johniel, that's why Hannity never did it!

Who's next on the liberal attack list....................Mike Pence?

Why not, you Repocons went after every Democrat you could...  :P

Of course, Democrats will ONLY go after those who did something wrong.
If you didn't do anything wrong, then you have nothing to fear.

BUT, Satan knows... (http://www.aesopsretreat.com/forum/Smileys/classic/evil.gif)

 
Notice that demoKKKcraps say "wrong" and not "illegal."    That gives lots of wiggle room and is subject to interpretation.  They know not everyone is a lawyer.  As an example, dims universally give BJ Clinton a pass on his sexual domination of subordinates because it was a "private matter" and "everyone does it."

I do not wish to come down on the looks or sex appeal of this dame... But you'd have to think that someone with Sean Hannity's ability and appearance would have to be pretty desperate to hit on someone such as her.

I don't think that he is or ever has been that desperate for sex. 

To be blatantly a sexist, She'd have to be able to suck the chrome off a trailer hitch before she would appeal to anyone other than someone who was drinking fairly heavy.

He hit her with his best group of lawyers..She is a loser and cannot continue much further.

"suck the chrome off a trailer hitch"?  I shouldn't have read this with a mouthful of tea, I'm still laughing so hard.

lol..Sorry, For some reason I believe that Willie Nelson told me that. 

poor jim and daniel...youse people are forever stuck in your liberal vs conservative death spiral...

I only pointed out the way it is these days.  Times have changed.

I pointed out that workplace standards have changed and that those in authority who don't take allegations seriously, end up regretting dismissing creepy talk as nothing.  It's clearly something, even if it's just a bit creepy, it doesn't belong in the work place.

You too easily dismiss so-called "locker-room" talk as unfounded.  you know anchoragedan, just like at the University of Alaska...


University of Alaska to reopen 23 sexual assault and harassment cases (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=10&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwi_z-yCz77TAhWJ24MKHZ81ApQQFghXMAk&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.adn.com%2Falaska-news%2Feducation%2F2017%2F02%2F20%2Funiversity-of-alaska-agrees-to-fix-problems-with-its-response-to-sexual-harassment-and-sexual-violence%2F&usg=AFQjCNG3-N3Jc2aloRj6Qcqqp5zzqRcRWA&sig2=Bhk5daMvdgH4dhUrHeM7aA)


The University of Alaska will reopen 23 sexual assault and sexual harassment complaint files at its three campuses under an agreement with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights.

In an announcement Monday, University of Alaska President Jim Johnsen said the university would also complete a list of steps to improve its responses to such complaints in the future.

The 23 complaints that UA needs to reassess, according to the agreement, were brought between 2011 and mid-2015, Johnsen said at a news conference Monday afternoon announcing the agreement with the federal government. He acknowledged that the university's compliance problems ranged from "very serious failures to documentation issues."

The 18-page indictment follows a nearly three-year review by the Office for Civil Rights into the university system's handling of sexual assault and sexual harassment complaints.

[/HIGHLIGHT][/SIZE][/FONT]


Bullshit!  I never made up lies to besmirch any democrat.  I only went after them for what they admitted doing.

[/HIGHLIGHT][/SIZE][/FONT]


Wrong.  They attacked Clarence Thomas. They attacked Robert Bork.  They attacked Neil Gorsuch.  They attacked Jeff Sessions.  They attacked Bill O'Reilly.  They attacked Sean Hannity.

Poor johniel.  Makes partisan false accusations and then blames his opponents.

teehee.

tea hee

poor pathetic anchoragedan. 

there are those who say...there's a hidden reason for his fascination with sexual harassment.

Says the person who defends Islamofascism!

https://www.youtube.com/v/RoBI1QejQaU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RoBI1QejQaU

jw,
Now that the accuser has recanted...where will you loons go next? 

Wrong.  They [Democrats] attacked Clarence Thomas. They attacked Robert Bork.  They attacked Neil Gorsuch. 
They attacked Jeff Sessions.  They attacked Bill O'Reilly.  They attacked Sean Hannity.

All of those people had accusers, except Gorsuch.  I heard Gorsuch is a nice guy, but you
Repocons ahve poisoned Congress to the point that Gorsuch HAD to be opposed.

Don't you want to know about possible problems with a Supreme Court Justice?  Bork latter admitted what an ass he is.
Not sure about Thomas, but both he and Anita Hill moved on...
Sessions deserves everything he gets.  He was PROUD of his discrimination!
O'Really and Hannity dish it out on a regular basis, so it is only fair for them to get what they give.
If they can't handle it, then they need to get out of show-biz.
BTW - Why don't you want to know if O'Really and/or Hannity are sexual predators?
I WOULD want to know if they are harassing women, or fondling little girls...  Why don't you?

davik,

If President Trump gets the privilege of appointing replacements for Ginsberg and Breyer...will you libs go into full-scale revolt...and what will that revolt be?

Anyone can make an accusation!

Proving it is much more difficult!

Davik, why are you opposed to demanding proof?

Do you believe every person who is accused of something is guilty and should loose their jobs?

Do you still believe the Duke Lacrosse team is guilty of rape?

After all the accusation is a conviction according to you!

Never said they were guilty, but why are you opposed to an investigation?
If Hannity has nothing to hide, then he should WELCOME an investigation.

Why are you so blindly supporting him?  You should want to know the truth.
But then Cave trolls like you, have never liked the truth...

Why are they being punished before the investigation begins?

You got it backward, Davik!

Poor pathetic johniel.  He makes up accusations without evidence and then claims they are absolute fact.


And yet johniel is the one who keeps bringing up the topic.  Hmmm, why is that do you suppose?

Bingo!  That's what I just said.  But you denied democrats make false accusations.  I just showed you examples where they did make false accusations.


Yep.  But  I don't want false accusations made in order to block them for politically ideologically reasons.  Why is it Republicans never block democrat nominees, as radical as folks like Ginsberg, Sotomayor and Kagan are?


No, he didn't.  Bork was supremely qualified, but the left blocked him for purely ideological reasons.  Bork would have been as good, if not better than Scalia.


Anita Hill lied.


Cool.  He is an honorable man.  The left made up false accusations that Sessions is a racist.


Another false accusation.


They don't make up lies.


I agree.  But they are getting false accusations even though they did not give out false accusations.


I did want to know.  Now that I know they are not, I feel obliged to call out those who make false accusations.  The question is why don't you want to know if they are innocent?


I told you, I did want to know if.  Now that I learned they aren't, I have moved on.  Why don't you?

I do remember Bork... The act committed by the Democratic party actually added a new word in the English language and that was the act of being BORKED! Which means of course being denied because of the political demands by an another political party. 

WE can still see the results of such blatant attacks. 

Eventually we shall get even... Whatshisname (Merrit) that Obama chose would not count as he just happened to attempt to replace a conservative at the wrong time.